RobbynStenson604

Like a lot of people in the United States, I have a job. I operate, they spend me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as they see fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test, which I have no difficulty with. And the major cause I have no issue with a drug test is simply because I have nothing to hide. What I do have a dilemma with is the distribution of my taxes to people who are carrying out drugs and never ever have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't 1 have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check, simply because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please realize, I have no difficulty with helping men and women get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a issue with helping someone sit on their butt. Could you envision how much funds the state would save if individuals had to pass a urine test to get a public help check? A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot plan of random substance abuse testing in at least three counties. Drug testing started at the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated region of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods. All the new applicants for that region had to give a urine sample to officials or give up their correct to any government help. In addition, any applicants currently in the technique had to submit to random testing. A class action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days prior to schedule testing. The suit charges that the program violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan mothers and a Detroit organization (The Westside Mothers) were named in the suit. The organization focuses on representing hundreds of welfare recipients and their families. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country can be subjected to a search by the government unless there is affordable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients could be poor, but that is not a crime not however, anyway." I have spoken to a number of folks in individual and on forums about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have the exact same stance, that it is unconstitutional. In my opinion, it seems that I am not pushing random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the government. So just like submitting paperwork, you must submit a urine sample. Yet another stance men and women talk about is false positives. Well if they claim false positive, then do a hair follicle test. If urine test are unconstitutional, then scrap the complete welfare plan. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com. how to pass a saliva drug test