利用者:RolenHassell320 reinle

The publisher's justification for a new "edition" is that [www.MyParallelBible.com Chant D'Esperance] was initial printed in 1909 added material and printed another edition in 1917. however it's an author's preogative to change his own works, however that actually does not give others, over 45 years after his death, a blank check to form alterations and then sign his name to it!

If we tend to altered the ending of "Macbeth" we might be less than honest to claim that the modification met Shakespeare's approval.

Secondly, the editors exercised nice liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt necessary enough to incorporate in his work. within the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.

New Scofield: "Among the changes and enhancements in this edition are: vital word changes in the text to help the reader; a modified system of self-pronunciation; revision of many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, together with designation of the author, theme, and date; a lot of subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and also the addition of many new notes;: additional marginal references; a wholly new chronology; a new index; a concordance especially ready for this edition; new maps; and additional legible type. a number of these features are explained below."

By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and many different features.

[www.MyParallelBible.com Spanish English bilingual bible] give his approval to those changes? Not unless one of the 9 committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!

In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes created were arbitrary choices of the revision committee.

"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a bunch."

What are the results of such shenanigans? One example can suffice. allow us to examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the [www.MyParallelBible.com Haitian Creole Bible] concerning baptism.

"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by every major group within the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized in concert of 2 sacraments - the other being the Lord's Supper. Since early within the Church's history three totally different modes of baptism are used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."

Here we tend to see that the 9 revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there's a distinction between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". might I ask? When one group is defined as "Protestant" what is the other cluster called?

Secondly, the 9 apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, without scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling also as immersion.

Remember, the footnote is found in a S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book that claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one in all its editors.

What does the footnote for Acts 8:12 in the REAL [www.MyParallelBible.com Scofield bible] of 1917 that had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?

Nothing. there is no such footnote!

That's right! The New Haitian Creole Bible never approved of and never had in a text anytime in his life time!

I ask you, is that this honest?

Proof that the massive print [www.MyParallelBible.com french english Parallel bible] is found on almost each page where the margin notes the dual Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible isn't a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.

It might be noted that in recent years the scale and form of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to a lot of resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. several Christians who want a true Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a replacement Scofield Bible by mistake.